Wednesday, September 25, 2019
Philo 115 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
Philo 115 - Essay Example been playing dirty power politics in the White House, the man in the conversations responds by derogatorily attacking the Clintons and he says that the Clintons are Arkansas ad for that reason they are next to the Orkies. Question 3. The correct fallacy for this snippet is the fallacy of begging the question. This is because the conclusion that, weeks of patient investigation had revealed that gas leaked at Bhopal India with thousands of investigation is already presumed in the premise that something went wrong. (a) Small Sample fallacy: Paul Stiglich committed this fallacy by claiming that there was a necessary connection between the ceremony performed by the Red Indian and the heavy rain that fell shortly after the performance. This is because Stiglich did not have enough samples to make that conclusion; Stiglichââ¬â¢s conclusion is based on small sample ( one sample only). (b) Hasty Conclusion: Paul Stiglich committed this fallacy by drawing a general conclusion from a particular single case. By claiming that the Red Indianââ¬â¢s performance had a connection and actually caused the heavy rain that fell after the Indianââ¬â¢s performance, Stiglich made a hasty generalization because he did not have sufficient evidence to make such a general claim. (c) The Fallacy of Supressed Evidence : By claiming that the performance of the Red Indian cause the heavy rain that fell shortly after the Red-Indianââ¬â¢s performance, Paul Stiglich overlooking, suppressed, and omitting other important evidence on what causes the rain. This is because there is sufficient scientific evidence on what causes rain and how rain comes about. Stiglich omitted such evidence in making his conclusion that the Red Indianââ¬â¢s performance caused the rain. (d) The Fallacy of Superstition: Paul Stiglichââ¬â¢s claim that the Red-Indianââ¬â¢s performance cause the heavy rain that fell after the performance is clearly a superstitious claim. This is because there is no scientific proof that such a
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.